ne. Evidence supporting the reli


Spine. Evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the Nepali Version of Oswestry Disability Index (NODI) exists, but its responsiveness is yet to be . Pooled correlations with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) with other instruments measuring related or unrelated constructs in patients with nonspecific low back pain: (A) correlation between RMDQ and physical functioning subscale of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36-PF) in 384 patients, (B . Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.

properties of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 1.0. (2006) speak for the construct validity . This is an observational study on the measurement properties of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 1.0. Scores greater than 40% suggest a more detailed investigation is warranted. Abstract. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, et al. 13, 14 We limited the study . Design Head-to-head clinimetric comparison. published an initial version of the questionnaire, which has since been modified several times to date. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). . Objectives. To validate the English and Marathi versions of ODI (version 2.1a). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most used assessment scales for patients with spine conditions, and translations into several languages have already been available. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 200 patients with low back pain (LBP) completed an English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires (100 each), visual analogue scale, and Roland-Morris . Spine 2000;25(24):3115-24; Davies CC, Nitz AJ.Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. A mixed methods approach was used to investigate the nature of AMC-related low-back and lower-extremity pain and disability. Summary of Background Data. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Objectives. The correlation of both scales was . Request PDF | Validity and Reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in Indian population. J. The validity was tested comparing ODI scores with the following measurements: Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, SF-36, and a Numerical Pain Scale. Validity / Reliability / Predictive Ability. Self-administered condition-specific questionnaires are important tools for assessing a patient. 3. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Measurement Properties of the Oswestry Disability Index in Recipients of Lumbar Spine Surgery. [Key words: low back pain, disability, Oswestry disability index, Turkish version] Spine 2004;29:581-585 The restoration of normal function is considered a key Roselle Santos. Oswestry Disability Index consist of 10 section or 9 section divide the point out of 50 or 45 . prehensibility, internal consistency, and validity and is an adequate and useful instrument for the assessment of disability in patients with low back pain. Baker DJ, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT. In this study, we independently developed a Japanese . Guyatt G.H., Berman L.B., Townsend M. et al. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most commonly used outcome measures for individuals with low back pain (LBP) 2-4 The ODI is a self-administered questionnaire that requires 5 minutes to complete and 1 minute to score. Forty-eight subjects with acute low back pain (LBP) and 63 subjects with chronic LBP, whose native language was Arabic, completed a demographic questionnaire, the FABQ, a pain intensity numerical scale, the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MOSW), and the SF-36 questionnaire. Firch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo N. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures. The correlation of the Oswestry Disability Index with the six-point pain rating scale produced a Spearman's rho value of 0.835 (n . However, the scale's discriminative validity and responsiveness to the clinical change was somewhat understudied in these translated versions of the ODI. Methods. Cross-cultural adaptation of the ODI is important because not all populations are proficient in English. Gronblad M., Hupli M., Wennerstrand P. et al. Eur Spine J. Cross-cultural adaptation of the ODI is important because not all populations are proficient in English. We sought to assess the validity of ODI to capture disability caused by SI joint pain and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) after SI joint treatment. Oswestry Disability Index Objective Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. The Oswestry Disability Index can help provide objective data about a patient's low back pain and is a validated measure backed by research that can be used to justify the need for medical treatment. Face validity and content validity were ensured. Read Paper. The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: its reliability, repeatability A previous. published an initial version of the questionnaire, which has since been modified several times to date. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain disability index (PDI) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients //Clin. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most commonly used scales that assess the disability related to LBP [ 2, 3 ]. BACKGROUND Among all musculoskeletal disorders back pain is the most common reason for functional limitation in working age. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated functional measure for lower back pain, but its responsiveness to SI joint treatment has yet to be established. Validity: The results of a very similar translation of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire by Osthus et al. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Summary of Background Data. . We sought to assess the validity of ODI to capture disability caused by SI joint pain and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) after SI joint treatment. Functional status is subjectively classified into five categories: minimal (0%-20%), moderate (21%-40%), serious (40%-60%), crippled (61%-80%), and complete impairment (81%-100%) [31]. Summary of Background Data. The Oswestry Disability Index assesses ten different aspects of disability (pain, personal care, lifting, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, walking and travelling).

The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. 9. . Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp.

2016;20(3):7-11. - Vol. The SRS-30 seems to be better when evaluating the emotional and psychological functions. Objective To examine the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of 3 commonly used questionnaires for assessing physical function (ie, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale [QBPDS], and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]) in older patients undergoing chiropractic care for low back pain (LBP). . Jeremy Fairbank. Validity and reliability of hausa version of the oswestry disability index. The VAS is a uni-dimensional measure of pain intensity that we selected because of validity, ease and frequency of use in many different clinical settings (49,50). . The development of the Oswestry Disability Index was initiated by John O'Brien in 1976. A Disability Index Score of 0% to 20% equals minimal disability, 21% to 40% equals moderate disability, 41% to 60% equals severe disability, 61% to 80% equals crippled, and 81% to 100% indicates a patient that is either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms. 2012 Aug ;21;21 (8):1596-602 ( Full text article) Kannada: Mohan V, G S P, Meravanigi G, N R, Yerramshetty J. Using results of Braden et al., a standard deviation of 8.3 points for the Oswestry Disability Index was used for effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction in LBP patients . Purpose To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). In 1980, O'Brien et al. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Self-administered condition-specific questionnaires are important tools for assessing a patient. Mbada CE, Auwa MA. I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. Background and Purpose.The quality of a disability scale should dictate when it is used. | Study design: A total of 200 patients with low back pain (LBP) completed an . Reference Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: A study of Reliability and Validity.

The reliability and construct validity of the Malay version of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire were acceptable for assessing functional status of Malay speaking patients with low back pain.

In 1980, O'Brien et al. Abstract Context: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated assessment tool for evaluating disability in LBP patients. The ODI has been tested extensively for validity and reliability in a range of different settings2,5,6,7. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure, and the process of using the ODI is reviewed and should be the subject of further research. Concurrent validity of the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Greek translations was assessed with their correlation to the six-point pain scale. It is considered the 'gold standard' [ 2] for measuring disability and quality of life (QoL) impairment for adults with low back pain (LBP). Pain pressure threshold (PPT), Profile of Mood States, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36, Cervical Range of Motion. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was pioneered by John O'Brien in 1976 and was developed following patient interviews which focused on low back pain. 8 after its introduction, the original questionnaire has been upgraded several times and the current version recommended Methods oswestry disability index (odi) is the most used and validated outcome measure for evaluation of low back pain. . 2013; 38 . The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is among the most commonly used patient reported outcome measures to measure disability due to LBP. The scoring of the ODI is the simple sum score of the items of the ODI multiplied by two [ 3 ]. It has been extensively tested, showed good psychometric properties, and applicable in a wide variety of settings.

The results are shown in Table 4. Acronym ODI Assessment Type Patient Reported Outcomes Cost Description Good . Second ed. 7 odi has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties in a wide variety of clinical care and research settings. A total of 200 patients with low back pain (LBP) completed an English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires (100 each), visual analogue scale, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. View Article Adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index to Kannada Language and Evaluation of Its Validity and Reliability. The Oswestry Disability Index is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used for the investigation of low back musculoskeletal disorders. Both the ODI and the the SRS-30 provide valid scores in evaluating health-related quality of life and/or level of disability among patients with prolonged degenerative thoracolumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Background Although the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) has shown a preferable psychometric properties in patients with low back pain (LBP), but no study has yet determined these in conservative . Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 174-186 399-408(10) Baker D., Pynsent PB, Fairbank JC (1989) The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: its reliability, repeatability and validity, and a comparison with the St Thomas's Disability Index. Grnblad M, Jrvinen E, Hurri H, Hupli M, Karaharju EO. Objectives. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-273. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated functional measure for lower back pain, but its responsiveness to SI joint treatment has yet to be established. . 0 to 21% indicate minimal disability . Objectives To measure and compare the structural validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Scoliosis Research Society-30 (SRS-30) questionnaire in an adult population with prolonged degenerative thoracolumbar disease. Design Methods . This study aimed to determine the content and construct validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for an AMC-appropriate low-back and lower-extremity pain-related disability questionnaire. Thirty patients completed the FABQ a second time 3-7 days later. Validity / Reliability / Predictive Ability. The development of the Oswestry Disability Index was initiated by John O'Brien in 1976. the Greek translation of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland-Morris Disability Ques-tionnaire reached a Cronbach's alpha coef-cient of 0.833 and 0.885 respectively. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Arch Physiother Glob Res [Internet]. Validity was assessed using coefficient omega, ceiling/floor effects, and confirmatory factor analysis. Pain. To (1) determine the construct validity of the tool, specifically structural validity; (2) analyze the criterion validity of the tool, specifically concurrent validity against proxy measures of pain, function, and quality of life and predictive An effect size of Cohen's d = 0.83 was calculated when using the reported minimal clinically important difference of a 10-point change [57,80]. The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Study Design Observational cohort study. The total score will be calculated by summing up all the points, with the largest possible sum being 50. Issue Section: Questionnaire Review Originally published in 1980, The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [ 1] is a validated, 10-point patient-reported outcome questionnaire. The derived score of the ODI is a measurement of the level of disability related to LBP [ 3 ]. Oswestry Disability Index is an instrument or scale use for the evaluation of pain . The purposes of this study were to examine the validity of a global rating of change as a reflection of meaningful change in patient status and to compare the measurement properties of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QUE). Low back pain can result from a variety of different causes, including: 1 Low back muscle strain Herniated or bulging discs Nerve root compression Objective. Journal of Manipulative and . It is a self-administered questionnaire and consists of ten sections that are designed to assess the limitations of various daily life activities. Development. . The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure, and the process of using the ODI is reviewed and should be the subject of further research. Eur Spine J. Validity and reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a) in Indian population. the results showed that the Filipino translation of Oswestry Disability Index possessed satisfactory psychometric . Low back pain is recognized as an important public health problem. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was . However, we also measured pain using two different multi . The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) consists of 10 items, each of which has six response options. The purpose of the study is to validate in Mexico a spanish translation of the 2.1a Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version in patients with low . To (1) determine the construct validity of the tool, specifically structural validity; (2) analyze the criterion validity of the tool, specifically concurrent validity against proxy measures of pain, function, and quality of life and predictive The ODI was more sensitive for variance of disability among different age and deformity groups. The Yoruba language is an indigenous language spoken by 40 million people in the Western part of Nigeria and some . References: 1.

Multivariable regression predicting ODI scores from PROMIS-29 domains was used to create a predictive equation. It has been extensively tested, showed good psychometric properties, and applicable in a wide variety of settings. Journal Article (Journal Article) The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators.